Halloween Sale
50% off Premium Yearly
Opinions Stockchase InsightsA Comment -- General Comments From an ExpertA CommentaryCOMMENTJan 17, 2025
Stockchase InsightsYou might be interested:
It's been underway since late August, but more evident in the TSX than in the S&P 500 (which is being narrowly held up by a narrow group of names).
The TSX is actually down roughly 5% off its late-August peak. Difficult to pinpoint any one reason. It's a broad-based selloff, a stealthy bear market.
Number one would be high oil prices, more problematic in the US than in Canada (given our heavier weighting in energy names). Inflation. Interest rates. Bond yields at 20-year highs.
Another shoe dropped this morning with the Canadian jobs report, massive job losses in September.
We're seeing anxiety around tech, and we're certainly not in the early innings of the AI story. Seeing more and more concerns about AI.
Will the colossal spending generate returns commensurate with their cost? The other things people are getting increasingly anxious about are guardrails, governance, and potential regulation around AI. It cries out for a globally coordinated approach. With globalization fracturing by the day, that's not happening.
All that angst is hitting the market.
As for earnings, tech earnings are going like gangbusters in the States. Yet there are jitters. Yesterday saw an erroneous news release about OpenAI's revenue being overestimated, and then retracted. That caused a big selloff in the tech complex yesterday.
A good way to summarize it is that there are a lot of "nervous hands" on these tech stocks.
;fill-opacity:1;'/%3e%3cpath%20d='M31%2018.6001V30H8V18.6001L14.1334%2022.4334L19.4999%2014L24.8669%2022.4334L31%2018.6001Z'%20fill='%23EE5432'%20style='fill:%23EE5432;fill:color(display-p3%200.9340%200.3310%200.1956);fill-opacity:1;'/%3e%3c/svg%3e){kind=small}
Premium content
Those are the 2 big ones. Long bonds in the US, and now globally, have started to blow out. Bonds at 2-decade highs are causing some jitters. He was at a dinner last week, and the talk was all about how can both rates and markets keep moving higher? So that's the #1 focus for investors.
Oil keeps getting pushed out. The war in Iran signals that it's winding down, and then it ramps back up.
Definitely a bit of investor fatigue out there the higher these two numbers go. It puts a lid on certain sectors of the market.
We're just 1-2 years into the enterprise adoption of AI -- big corporations that have entrenched IT systems starting to use AI for productivity. Have also seen deflation on the token cost (actual cost to run an AI model). Output is also much higher quality.
Seeing some deflation, particularly if you look at employment and wages. Very slow wage growth in the midst of cyclical factors (inflation, data centres, oil) that are pushing inflation. Structural inflationary forces on the other hand (wage growth, shelter, and housing), are starting to slow down. That supports a more moderate inflation outlook.
Not sure how much of a factor US midterms will be. Movement towards the Democrats might handcuff the Republicans on some parts of their agenda. It won't really change anything over the next 2 years, broadly speaking.
It really comes back to inflation and the price of oil. The last time we saw long bonds act the way they are now, we did eventually see some stress in the US banking sector. There's a very supportive movement to lower capital and reserve levels across the financial system in the Western world, so the stress might not appear. But as a rule of thumb, rates can go only so high before something in the financial system starts to bend, if not break.
So we might see some more volatility. Until we don't. ;)
All manias die. This is a mania, and a whopper. We haven't cleared the system of the last spate of mania that was the massive government spending through Covid, which people took and bought extremely aggressive stocks. Then the Fed tightened credit in 2022, and those people got slaughtered.
Usually when people get hit like that, if it doesn't last too long (just a year as opposed to 2-3), their memories aren't very good. So people have come back.
This particular mania is following on all the excitement of meme trades and growth stocks. Now here we are with a very justifiable investment boom in AI. But when everyone wants something, that's the time to stay away.
When it comes to futuristic-oriented things, there's an early stage of excitement. People see all the money that's "supposedly" being made, but the accounting starts getting really rough.
What's going on now is that the big hyperscaler companies, who were massive free cashflow generators and never borrowed money, are now reversing and are negative FCF. Investors always loved that they had wide moats with high FCF. But now they're giving that up to secure their AI participation. Investors are ignoring that in hopes that there's a reward at the end of the rainbow.
Watch the way the hyperscalers are borrowing. The sketchiness of the whole thing is that they're not using A-rated, 20-year bonds to do this. They're doing it off-balance sheet or through circular financing.
In 1999 Lucent Technologies loaned $$ to their startup customers, and counted repayment as 45% of their revenue that year. And we know how that ended.
We're already in that phase.
Doesn't do any short-term trading. Owns 27 stocks in his US fund, and 27 in the international one. There's a set of circumstances that his team looks for, if not a particular price.
If things are going really badly, and we're in a big recession, nobody wants to touch stocks, and investors are scared. That's when his team applies their criteria for stock selection. It takes a terrible market to create bargains out of wonderful companies, and you have to be patient.
His team sincerely believes that we're 6 years into 15-30 years of a relatively golden era where oil & gas companies outperform the rest of the stock market and the rest of the economy. On May 1, 2020 (when the Saudis took the price of oil to zero), that was like the bottom of the Great Depression or the Financial Crisis. Now we're reverting to the mean.
From 2017 to 2021 political/religious movement related to fossil fuels, and people were shamed from investing there. During that time, no one poked any holes in the ground or put capital to work. The antithesis of "drill, baby, drill".
Likes the sector. For example, he owns ULTA and CROX. Likes good retail. Addicted customers are always a wonderful thing.
He no longer owns SBUX, but it was one of his firm's first big wins. The US was in a deep recession for a long time after 2008, and everyone told him, "Bill, no one's going to buy a $4 cup of coffee." But it was the only luxury people kept. They weren't taking vacations or doing anything fun, but that little luxury kept people going.
His team believes that a lot of $$ is going to be made over the next 10 years building houses in the US. The level of building right now, for the population, is not keeping up. The situation won't be cured until the AI mania breaks; that demand for credit is creating upward pressure on mortgage rates.
The next bear market in the S&P 500 is probably going to be a doozy, and more than a year (like 1973-74 or 2007-2009). When that happens, the primary investors (50- to 80-year-olds) will flee to safety, and they'll flee to interest-bearing instruments. They'll take the bird in the hand and give up the two in the bush. (Right now, it's the 8 in the bush. The bird in the hand doesn't have anything :)
We're not going back to 1-2%, that was just a bit of Covid-induced despair. But rates will, eventually, be lower.
Sentiment among the homebuilders is at very low levels.
Benefits of Direct Indexing:
Direct Indexing can be cheaper
When you own an ETF or fund, you pay an ongoing annual fee to own that fund. With direct indexing, you in theory do not have to pay anything to hold the index allocation. While we think investors can start to split hairs a little when evaluating a 0.05% fee fund to a 0.1% fund, the reality is that ETFs gained their edge because of low costs and now might be a victim of what they used to succeed in the first place.
Direct Indexing can be more tax efficient
When you own a fund and want to rebalance or do tax-loss selling, you can either sell units of the fund or not and those units are sitting at either a gain or a loss. With direct indexing, you would have an ability to not sell the entire index and sell only individual securities that have under or over performed within the index. So, if energy had a bad year, you could sell all energy stocks in the TSX for tax losses and continue to hold all of the other items within the fund so you don’t trigger gains. Put another way, the index itself could be up on the year but you can still harvest a tax-loss within the index. In the ETF or fund format, you would only be able to trigger a tax gain on the entire fund with this scenario.
It can be a tool to generate alpha
The potential strategies behind direct indexing could be countless as the technology develops and improves over the years. One can envision simple factor filters where an investor can exclude any company in the index with debt over ‘X’ or any company with a payout ratio over 100%. Again, the opportunities are endless and it has the potential to give even passive investors a lot of power in tweaking their ‘passive’ allocations in a way that makes them more comfortable with their portfolio and even allowing for differentiated returns from the index, for good or bad. Perhaps the ironic thing here is that things might come full circle and direct indexing strategies will lead to investors becoming active investors again and not even realizing it!
Unlock Premium - Try 5i Free