Stockchase Opinions

Ian R. CampbellA Comment -- General Comments From an ExpertA CommentaryCOMMENTSep 17, 2008

Are you thinking 'between the lines' about the current U.S. Financial Industry Turmoil? I made the following points (among others) in posts I made to StockResearchPortalBlog.com last Saturday morning (before the Lehman Brothers demise) and yesterday morning. I am repeating them in this e-mail for your consideration. 1. Each day (and virtually each hour) new negative U.S. based financial events are reported. 2. These events are occurring immediately before the U.S. Presidential election, in circumstances where one would think the current U.S. Government would exercise a 'postponement strategy' until after November 4 if they had any option to do that. 3. Critically important decisions are being taken in very short time spans, which is contrary to the way things should work. 4. "Until U.S. housing prices stabilize and U.S. Consumer confidence grows, I worry 'Canada's favourite neighbour' will simply go from (major financial) problem to problem". I made this comment on Saturday before Alan Greenspan stated this same thing in a Sunday television interview. 5. The U.S. Government, frankly to my surprise, did not support Lehman Brothers.ie 6. Bank of America announced Monday it is buying Merrill Lynch, with various prices being publicly stated - one of which suggests a price that is a 70% premium to last Friday's stock price close. This is being done in circumstances where rumor has it Merrill Lynch might otherwise have gone the way of Lehman Brothers. In the 'valuation world' I am familiar with, premium prices are not paid for distressed assets unless there is competitive bidding for them. So why the premium? Transactions often close following detailed due diligence at prices less than first offered. Could this be one of them? 7. The U.S. Federal Reserve apparently announced Monday it will expand access to credit for struggling financial companies - which to me seems indirectly to circumvent Henry Paulson's strong position made last Friday that the U.S. Government would not provide aid to Lehman. 8. 10 'Global Banks' apparently agreed Monday to buttress the U.S. Government's efforts by providing $70 billion in a new 'lending program'. Where does this money come from? Could it be as simple as a pass-through from the U.S. Government in circumstances where aid is given to a specific financial firm without the U.S. Government having to appear to be the benefactor? 9. Early Monday morning the Wall Street Journal reported that American International Group Inc., a major U.S. insurer whose shares dropped 31% last Friday, is seeking a $40 billion bridge loan from the Federal Reserve. The AIG circumstance has deteriorated since then with numerous reports and commentaries being made this morning. 10. It was reported on Monday that China's central bank, 'acting against a background of extreme stress in global financial markets', on Monday cut benchmark lending rates by 0.27% lowering the cost of one-year bank loans to 7.2% (effective September 17), and the 'reserve requirement' for all but China's 5 biggest banks by 1% (effective September 25). This to me is interesting evidence of the immediate 'ripple effect' U.S. financial system issues have, and will continue to have, on the global economy. All of these things, individually and particularly in combination, suggest to me the U.S. Financial System clearly is uncharted waters, and may well be on a collision course with an iceberg that is close at hand. Under any circumstance we are living in interesting times.
It's the ideal tool to help you make quicker, more informed decisions for managing and tracking your investments.

You might be interested:

COMMENT
Markets.

Moving higher, but the shift is tilting toward caution. In the rebound we saw through March/April, investors were willing to buy almost anything tied to AI, growth, and economic recovery.

After a strong rally from the lows, markets are becoming a little bit more selective as valuations rise and expectations are harder to meet. The technology and AI-related spending will continue to lead the market, but investors are no longer rewarding just the story alone. Companies are needing to prove earnings growth can keep pace with the enthusiasm around AI.

Reopening of the IPO market reflects stronger investor confidence and improving risk appetite. But parts of the market can become overheated after the type of rapid rally we've seen.

Geopolitical risks are starting to dwindle a bit, and markets are reacting to that expectation. Interest rates remain a major driver of markets as well. 

Expects volatility to continue in both directions until we hit midterms in the fall.

COMMENT
Canada technically in a recession.

She's been saying that we've been in a recession for a while with layoffs increasing. As for the economy though, banks are continuing to show resilience even with mortgage renewal and interest rates where they are. Their balance sheets have been able to withstand all that.

Materials and technology have quietly supported the TSX. Pullback in energy will definitely have an impact on the outlook for the stock market. In case we see additional weak data out of Canada, she's tilted her portfolios toward the US and international.

There are strong businesses in Canada, but you have to be selective. She's optimistic for the next 18-24 months, and there are opportunities. Focus on quality businesses with durable earnings and longer-term themes.

COMMENT
Bank profits -- where to deploy?

Consider directing proceeds into materials, consumer staples or some selective technology names.

COMMENT
Gold.

She's not a gold bug. If there's money to make, she's in. Otherwise, she'll find something else.

Still likes it right now. She owns ABX, WPM, and some ETFs. No longer just an inflationary story, as central banks continue to buy. Still works as a diversifier and as portfolio insurance. Tends to benefit when uncertainty rises, and she expects a lot of that for at least the next 6-8 months.

BUY
Copper.

Enormous amounts required by AI, data centres, electrification, and power grids. Supply struggling to keep up. Gives you exposure to long-term economic and technology growth.

COMMENT
Markets.

It's been a counterintuitive rally, really since Trump got into office last year between tariffs and the war. Most critics are saying that even if the Strait opens, it'll still be a challenge for oil for a long time. That'll mean higher costs. 

Even with lighter GDP data out of the US today, odds are more toward a rate hike than a reduction. So, why are markets rallying as they are? The reason is that earnings growth is still phenomenal. It's supposed to be 24% this year, and companies aren't weakening that outlook despite potential margin pressure.

The picture of NA companies has changed. Input costs of higher oil aren't what they used to be, and companies are able to absorb them. This year still looks good, and we're still looking at 12-14% earnings growth next year.

Earnings growth is overpowering everything else at this point.

COMMENT
BOC says financial stability is vulnerable to political shocks.

Agrees, though the US economy is in slightly better shape than the Canadian one. 

We're very vulnerable to these shocks. What we do have going for us in Canada is this incredible urge to nation-build, which is affecting swaths of our economy. Seeing that in pipelines, infrastructure, oil, construction, and even the banks. For the first time in 15 years, we're seeing foreign money really interested in coming into Canada.

Yes, we have some weakness here with higher rates and an anemic job picture, but we have fund flows finally coming to Canada.

BUY ON WEAKNESS
Investor's confused why Canadian banks reported great results, yet stocks are down.

There's an old axiom:  Buy the rumour, sell the news. It's a common pattern. No surprise, banks exceeded estimates. Banks have had a huge run and have gone into a whole new trading range. Markets do make sense if you watch them studiously for 30 years :)

You have to assess the quality of the earnings and what the banks are saying. This time around, yes, you want to buy this dip.

COMMENT
AI and engineering consultancy.

Agrees with the caller who said that AI won't hurt employment, and is going to make us all better at what we do. AI is terrific. Doesn't see AI building these buildings and doing all the complicated computations. These firms will benefit from the AI tools to lower costs and increase efficiencies.

COMMENT
Market strength due to the AI story?

Yes, a lot of it is that. The first AI phase rewarded the semiconductor and software stocks. The next phase may increasingly reward electricity infrastructure and real assets. The capex spend is broad and has support from many governments around the world.

It's not just software anymore; it's now colliding with the physical economy. AI can't run on enthusiasm alone. Data centres need electricity, transformers, cooling, copper, transmission infrastructure, and so on. Sees the impact broadening out to the physical economy.

We'll have to make investments in mines, plants, and refining to be able to build out the physical infrastructure to provide the electricity for the AI wave that's coming. It'll probably mean structurally stickier inflation. It'll consume a lot of real-world inputs like energy, labour, materials, and infrastructure.

All that will cause market leadership to broaden to mid-caps, cyclicals, industrials, utilities, and so on.

COMMENT
Sector focus.

Investors want to make sure they have some exposure to the areas that are a bit more physical. In Canada, our index tends to skew that way. We have lots of rocks and trees and oil and gas that build our economy.

In the US, the S&P 500 is dominated by technology stocks. Oil & gas represents only about 4% of that index. So the big growth engine in the US is complemented by Canada's resource infrastructure.

COMMENT
Dimensional Fund Advisors.

Focused on systematic, evidence-based, academic research. Largely out of the Chicago School of Business. Great job trying to harness the different factors -- for example, higher quality, or smaller companies, or cheaper valuation, or higher profitability.

Factor-based strategies can underperform for long periods of time, such as when large-cap technology dominates.

Probably the class act of ETF/fund companies in terms of extracting excess returns from factors.

COMMENT

We forget to look at the positives in the market, possibly: a resolution to the US-Iran war, continued AI investment, continued infrastructure investment amid re-shoring, or an economic boom from AI efficiency, possibly in increased jobs or productivity. Also, possibly good, old-fashioned earnings growth. There's also something to worry about, like geopolitical risk. About 70% of the TSX is financials, commodities and energy, which worked well in 2025, but if say two of those three go sideways, then the TSX could lag other markets. He focuses on growth and momentum, tech and AI. He looks at strong balance sheets, good momentum like 52-week highs and positive cash flow.

COMMENT

He is optimistic in spite of the volatility and is still seeing earnings estimates for the S&P 500 continue to climb and even accelerate a bit in March and April. He hasn't seen the AI parade affected by higher oil prices as well as the consumers too much. Corporations are still doing quite well and AI will benefit many companies throughout the whole economy. He has seen big pullbacks when investors get shaken up regarding the future of AI which presents buying opportunities for trading. The market is expecting a relatively short term for the war with Iran. However if it drags on for a long time this would have an impact everywhere in the economy including a spike of oil to $200.