Ian R. CampbellA Comment -- General Comments From an ExpertA CommentaryCOMMENTSep 17, 2008

The deal between the US and Russia for diesel is a drop in the bucket and will have little impact. What's interesting is the US seems to have relaxed the sanctions against Russia, but now faces US bi-partisan pushback. He'd be surprised if this deal goes through, considering many Republicans oppose it. He doesn't see an end to to the US-Iran war. Iran has leverage and will string out this war for as long as they can to gain even more leverage. He's amazed that some believe that oil prices will fall after the U.S. midterm elections. In Canada, Alberta's premier first proposed the TransMountain extension a year ago, but nothing has been done so far. Carney isn't moving at breathtaking speed, as promised.

It's been underway since late August, but more evident in the TSX than in the S&P 500 (which is being narrowly held up by a narrow group of names).

The TSX is actually down roughly 5% off its late-August peak. Difficult to pinpoint any one reason. It's a broad-based selloff, a stealthy bear market.

Number one would be high oil prices, more problematic in the US than in Canada (given our heavier weighting in energy names). Inflation. Interest rates. Bond yields at 20-year highs.

Another shoe dropped this morning with the Canadian jobs report, massive job losses in September.

We're seeing anxiety around tech, and we're certainly not in the early innings of the AI story. Seeing more and more concerns about AI. 

Will the colossal spending generate returns commensurate with their cost? The other things people are getting increasingly anxious about are guardrails, governance, and potential regulation around AI. It cries out for a globally coordinated approach. With globalization fracturing by the day, that's not happening.

All that angst is hitting the market.

As for earnings, tech earnings are going like gangbusters in the States. Yet there are jitters. Yesterday saw an erroneous news release about OpenAI's revenue being overestimated, and then retracted. That caused a big selloff in the tech complex yesterday.

A good way to summarize it is that there are a lot of "nervous hands" on these tech stocks.

Those are the 2 big ones. Long bonds in the US, and now globally, have started to blow out. Bonds at 2-decade highs are causing some jitters. He was at a dinner last week, and the talk was all about how can both rates and markets keep moving higher? So that's the #1 focus for investors.

Oil keeps getting pushed out. The war in Iran signals that it's winding down, and then it ramps back up. 

Definitely a bit of investor fatigue out there the higher these two numbers go. It puts a lid on certain sectors of the market.

We're just 1-2 years into the enterprise adoption of AI -- big corporations that have entrenched IT systems starting to use AI for productivity. Have also seen deflation on the token cost (actual cost to run an AI model). Output is also much higher quality.

Seeing some deflation, particularly if you look at employment and wages. Very slow wage growth in the midst of cyclical factors (inflation, data centres, oil) that are pushing inflation. Structural inflationary forces on the other hand (wage growth, shelter, and housing), are starting to slow down. That supports a more moderate inflation outlook.

Not sure how much of a factor US midterms will be. Movement towards the Democrats might handcuff the Republicans on some parts of their agenda. It won't really change anything over the next 2 years, broadly speaking.

It really comes back to inflation and the price of oil. The last time we saw long bonds act the way they are now, we did eventually see some stress in the US banking sector. There's a very supportive movement to lower capital and reserve levels across the financial system in the Western world, so the stress might not appear. But as a rule of thumb, rates can go only so high before something in the financial system starts to bend, if not break.

So we might see some more volatility. Until we don't. ;)

All manias die. This is a mania, and a whopper. We haven't cleared the system of the last spate of mania that was the massive government spending through Covid, which people took and bought extremely aggressive stocks. Then the Fed tightened credit in 2022, and those people got slaughtered.

Usually when people get hit like that, if it doesn't last too long (just a year as opposed to 2-3), their memories aren't very good. So people have come back.

This particular mania is following on all the excitement of meme trades and growth stocks. Now here we are with a very justifiable investment boom in AI. But when everyone wants something, that's the time to stay away.

When it comes to futuristic-oriented things, there's an early stage of excitement. People see all the money that's "supposedly" being made, but the accounting starts getting really rough.

What's going on now is that the big hyperscaler companies, who were massive free cashflow generators and never borrowed money, are now reversing and are negative FCF. Investors always loved that they had wide moats with high FCF. But now they're giving that up to secure their AI participation. Investors are ignoring that in hopes that there's a reward at the end of the rainbow.

Watch the way the hyperscalers are borrowing. The sketchiness of the whole thing is that they're not using A-rated, 20-year bonds to do this. They're doing it off-balance sheet or through circular financing.

In 1999 Lucent Technologies loaned $$ to their startup customers, and counted repayment as 45% of their revenue that year. And we know how that ended.

We're already in that phase.

Doesn't do any short-term trading. Owns 27 stocks in his US fund, and 27 in the international one. There's a set of circumstances that his team looks for, if not a particular price.

If things are going really badly, and we're in a big recession, nobody wants to touch stocks, and investors are scared. That's when his team applies their criteria for stock selection. It takes a terrible market to create bargains out of wonderful companies, and you have to be patient.

His team sincerely believes that we're 6 years into 15-30 years of a relatively golden era where oil & gas companies outperform the rest of the stock market and the rest of the economy. On May 1, 2020 (when the Saudis took the price of  oil to zero), that was like the bottom of the Great Depression or the Financial Crisis. Now we're reverting to the mean. 

From 2017 to 2021 political/religious movement related to fossil fuels, and people were shamed from investing there. During that time, no one poked any holes in the ground or put capital to work. The antithesis of "drill, baby, drill". 

Likes the sector. For example, he owns ULTA and CROX. Likes good retail. Addicted customers are always a wonderful thing. 

He no longer owns SBUX, but it was one of his firm's first big wins. The US was in a deep recession for a long time after 2008, and everyone told him, "Bill, no one's going to buy a $4 cup of coffee." But it was the only luxury people kept. They weren't taking vacations or doing anything fun, but that little luxury kept people going.

"On sale" in his books means according to his metrics, not just "down from where it was". A lot of things are overpriced, and then they go down quite a bit, but they're still overpriced. Just because something's pulled back, doesn't necessarily mean it's a good idea to buy it.