Opinions
Stockchase Insights A Comment -- General Comments From an Expert A Commentary COMMENT Jun 16, 2025
You might be interested:
He expects an agreement to agree on something at some point down the road, and the markets to be OK with that. Historically, these things are measured in years to fully play out. He does expect something of that order between now and that July 9 expiration date, though that date could be extended in view of Trump's volatility.
It's going to be President TACO going forward. Look at the "deal" they got from China last week. All of a sudden, it's still 55% tariff rates. Most importantly, the market seems OK with the tariff thing at the moment. The next moment could change that.
It's still a risk to the markets, but tariffs in the current package are inflationary. Trump needs tariffs to offset the costs of the "big, beautiful bill" that he wants and needs to pass. Still lots of uncertainties in front of us, but there's always stuff in front of us in terms of the market.
In an update to the dot plot, there's no expectation at all for a rate change. The question is will they choose to tilt a little bit at this meeting? Do they have enough information to say that they're leaning more towards an ease? Tightening is out of the picture. Even if inflation upticks for the next 6-12 months, extremely unlikely and difficult for the Fed (given the upcoming change in leadership, etc.) to want to raise rates.
The next move will be a rate cut, timing is uncertain. A lot will depend on the unfolding situation in the US labour market. Over the last month or so, we're starting to see weakness in the initial and continuing claims. These aren't worrisome by any stretch, but should be on the front burner now.
Prices are going up. In soft surveys of companies, 40% of companies said they're going to pass through some degree of pricing. Inventories that were built up in advance have, perhaps, already gone through the books for cost of good sold. There's more to come. To think there isn't, is a naive assumption.
It won't be a dramatic jump from 2.8% to 6%. But it'll creep into the mid-3% range. What happens now with oil prices is a real front-burner risk. When you have to spend an extra $20 a week to put gas in the tank, it really matters to the marginal consumer.
This isn't going to end until there's regime change in Iran, or Iran believes that Israel has the right to exist and doesn't further its ambition to erase Israel from the world. Unless that changes, which he can't see under any conditions, this is going to get worse before it gets better. He hates saying that, but it's his view.
Geopolitical Events
The question is should you play these things? If you a oriented to being a short-term trader, days to weeks, he has no issue on speculating around these geopolitical events. When there's a major event, you shouldn't ever really do anything radical to your portfolio like sell everything and go to cash. In the long run, that would really hurt you.
This current Iran-Israel conflict is a little bit different. He's brought in a graph of the US budget. At its peak in the 1980s (the Reagan years), military defense expense was 28% of GDP. During the Clinton years, a lot of money came out. The biggest line item in the US right now is social security.
Trump says the US is done policing the world, and other nations are going to have to pay a bit more. Congress pushed back a bit on support for Ukraine, and he suspects they'll push back a bit more on more money for supporting Israel.
During the pandemic, defense spending dropped to its lowest share of federal spending. Since then, it's started to go up again. Could be a trend. Seeing a lot of this around the world, even here in Canada. Relative to the US, most countries' spending levels are pretty benign.
The biggest thing here is the US deficit of $37T, and it's choking them. This "big, beautiful bill" is going to add to that. Money has to come out of the budget, and one of the areas could be military spending.
Look around the world at countries that spend the most in terms of military. North Korea is up at the top. What's interesting is that the Middle East and parts of Northern Africa are ramping up. He thinks this is for the protection of energy infrastructure in those parts of the world, and that's costing a lot more money.
When the Russia-Ukraine war started, all the excess oil that was going to Europe rebalanced over to Southeast Asia and Australia. So that part of the world doesn't want to see oil prices go up either.
If you want to make a trade and play the geopolitics of what's going on in the Middle East right now, and if oil prices are going to go up and persist, overweight oil drillers and energy names. XOP is an ETF that plays a broad number of oil drillers. Gold might be another one to tilt towards. We're not seeing a flight to safety in either the USD or US treasuries.
Don't sell everything and go to cash. Rebalance your portfolio or make some trades.
Oil: There's no way knowing if oil can stay above $70; the oil price is tough to peg. It is a risk asset that responds to geopolitical tension, but after this tension in the Middle East the price will probably not all down, but find balance and this issue will become a non-topic. He wouldn't be surprised to see oil a little higher by year's end. Cash levels: remain high as investor sentiment remains cautious. April remains in the memory, and caution is a good thing for the market. The time to worry is when people are super optimistic. He'd like to see this money bleed into the market as optimism improves. US Midterms: He expects Trump to be less unpredictable and less chaotic because the Republicans need to maintain their power which will be investor-friendly.
A broad topic. Defensive means predictability: utilities, consumer staples. Stocks that pay dividends and/or buyback shares. Also, telcos. Utilities are super defensive, because they basically issue a yield. Also, do you want that income stream coming from Canada or the U.S., considering taxes.
A.I. Investing Themes: Enhanced risk assessment and mitigation
AI models can provide sophisticated risk analysis by evaluating multiple risk factors simultaneously, including market volatility, correlation risks and company-specific threats detected through news and regulatory filings. Unlike traditional risk models, AI can dynamically map interconnections between sectors and assets, identifying how stress in one area could cascade through the financial system, and suggesting effective hedges. This thesis might be more helpful for hedge funds, as most individual investors do not do a lot of their own hedging. Most investors simply hold more cash if they are worried. But advisers can still look at enhanced risk management techniques to understand how different assets will interact, and it could be very helpful in monitoring an adviser’s book of business to see what total risk they are taking on. Or it could be helpful at the company level to prevent a Lehman Brothers situation where actual risk is much higher than what is perceived.
Unlock Premium - Try 5i Free