- Page 1/7
It is not CAD$ hedged. BMO has filed perspective on a bunch of new ETFs and there should be one available in the next month that is the CAD$ hedged version of this. They net about 10% premium on the puts. About 3% is lost due to puts being exercised so you get an extra 7% over the performance of the stocks within the ETF. It is not risky and is exposure to the US market. (Your exposure should net a long position, if it ever got executed).
It is not CAD$ hedged. BMO has filed perspective on a bunch of new ETFs and there should be one available in the next month that is the CAD$ hedged version of this. They net about 10% premium on the puts. About 3% is lost due to puts being exercised so you get an extra 7% over the performance of the stocks within the ETF. It is not risky and is exposure to the US market. (Your exposure should net a long position, if it ever got executed).
It has been in decline for a number of years but looks like it is forming a base. (Analysts’ Target: $95). It looks like it is fairly attractive, but he would sell after it got to $90. If it keeps making lower lows and lower highs then you have to question it.
It has been in decline for a number of years but looks like it is forming a base. (Analysts’ Target: $95). It looks like it is fairly attractive, but he would sell after it got to $90. If it keeps making lower lows and lower highs then you have to question it.
Analysts are looking at 5% revenue growth and more in earnings but he questions that. The chart looks good with higher highs and lower lows. (Analysts’ Target: $65).
Analysts are looking at 5% revenue growth and more in earnings but he questions that. The chart looks good with higher highs and lower lows. (Analysts’ Target: $65).
There is a $110 cash offer. The $98 stock price probably correctly reflects the risks. He does not have more to add. When there is an M&A deal, the charts don’t matter at all.
There is a $110 cash offer. The $98 stock price probably correctly reflects the risks. He does not have more to add. When there is an M&A deal, the charts don’t matter at all.
A year and a half of price weakness and then post-election it has done well along with some other car companies. You are smack dab in the middle of the trading range. He does not see a rosy outlook here and sees more downside risk than upside.
A year and a half of price weakness and then post-election it has done well along with some other car companies. You are smack dab in the middle of the trading range. He does not see a rosy outlook here and sees more downside risk than upside.
The stock is very cheap here, but the problem is that they have a net of only 1400 BOEs per day. We need to see a resolution to the ISIS problem and to the natural gas problem so they aren’t flaring the gas. It is only a speculative buy. Management has positioned the company to weather it.
The stock is very cheap here, but the problem is that they have a net of only 1400 BOEs per day. We need to see a resolution to the ISIS problem and to the natural gas problem so they aren’t flaring the gas. It is only a speculative buy. Management has positioned the company to weather it.
It is a cheap stock right here. They are sitting on 1.2 billion of cash. The basic problem is that production has been declining because they had been selling off assets. He give management lots of credit for cutting costs. They have lots of projects. Longer term it is a name you might want to own. You may be able to buy this below $13 if the oil price comes down $10-$20 during 2017.
It is a cheap stock right here. They are sitting on 1.2 billion of cash. The basic problem is that production has been declining because they had been selling off assets. He give management lots of credit for cutting costs. They have lots of projects. Longer term it is a name you might want to own. You may be able to buy this below $13 if the oil price comes down $10-$20 during 2017.