RNW vs. INE RNW depends on drop-down from the parent for growth. Whereas INE is an independent power producer. At current valuations, he prefers RNW. Pretty good visibility over the next few years. INE is more expensive and has good prospects, but its valuation doesn't have as much upside.

INE vs. RNW RNW depends on drop-down from the parent for growth. Whereas INE is an independent power producer. At current valuations, he prefers RNW. Pretty good visibility over the next few years. INE is more expensive and has good prospects, but its valuation doesn't have as much upside.

As an infrastructure play. Likes it, but his preferred way to play cell tower space is through cell tower companies like American Tower or SBAC. There's more leverage and the business is more stable.

BIP.UN vs. BAM Strong earnings. Sale of Enwave gave them a healthy profit. BAM is also a great company to invest in, especially as it's trading at a discount to NAV. But with BAM, you get exposure to BPY, BEP, and the rest of the suite. BIP is more of an operational manager. If you want more diversity, BAM gives you that. Having both in your portfolio gives you full exposure to the infrastructure asset class.

BAM vs. BIP.UN BIP.UN just reported strong earnings. Sale of Enwave gave them a healthy profit. BAM is also a great company to invest in, especially as it's trading at a discount to NAV. But with BAM, you get exposure to BPY, BEP, and the rest of the suite. BIP is more of an operational manager. If you want more diversity, BAM gives you that. Having both in your portfolio gives you full exposure to the infrastructure asset class.

A class 1 rail in the US, but on the smaller side. On the quality of the assets, prefers Union Pacific or CSX in the US. If this is a long-term hold, a good place to be. Strong name, irreplaceable asset. Cyclical. Yet CP is his #1 choice in North America.

Recovered quite nicely, but not to pre-pandemic levels. They're going ahead with their chemical plant, which has some risk. Better names in Canada like Keyera, TC Energy, Enbridge. Lower risk names that are priced at a bit of a premium, but have less execution risk.

For a retirement portfolio. Overall, likes it to navigate choppy waters ahead. Lower risk in growth profile than a name like Inter Pipline. Performed well in 2020, and positioned balance sheet well in 2021. Can be volatile, so perhaps not the best for a retirement portfolio. Something like a Fortis gives you a stable yield. Could also do a barbell approach, with some Pembina and some Fortis, or another high-quality Canadian utility, to limit the volatility.

For a retirement portfolio. Something like a Fortis gives you a stable yield for a retirement portfolio. Could also do a barbell approach, with some PPL and some Fortis, or another high-quality Canadian utility, to limit the volatility.

In the news a lot, and you never know what's going to come up from the past. Better E&C companies out there, such as WSP Global. It trades at a premium, but there's a reason for that. Better track record, recent acquisition will lead to growth opportunities, leveraged to environmental services that will be a tailwind for the next decade.