Stock price when the opinion was issued
Really only in the US, in the Innovators series, but only in USD, which is risky now. ZPAY-F gives you exposure to the US, but with the currency hedge, which he prefers. Buffers limit upside, but protect in the downside. It's like a 60/40 balance portfolio and it's tax efficient.
He uses it a lot. It writes puts on stocks to buy lower and sells calls. It pays a 6% yield. If the market slides, this will fall at half the rate of the market, and if the market rallies, this will rise at half the rate, but yet get tax-efficient income off US stocks. But this is not immune to market volatility.
He helped developed this ETF 5 years ago. He uses it. It targets 50% position in a long in a covered call + 50% holds a T-bill and sells puts to generate income. This yields 6%, and has half the volatility of the US stock market. Is tax efficient, because the dividends off the options are treated as capital gains.
He helped developed this ETF 5 years ago. He uses it. It targets 50% position in a long in a covered call + 50% holds a T-bill and sells puts to generate income. This yields 6%, and has half the volatility of the US stock market. Is tax efficient, because the dividends off the options are treated as capital gains.
Put-write covered call strategy, very tax-efficient yield strategy (though that doesn't matter in a TFSA). You'll have about half the risk of the S&P 500. If your house purchase is in the next year, then no. Not something you put your safe $$ in to use as a deposit for a house a year from now. If that purchase is 5-10 years down the road, then he likes it a lot.
It's still equity risk, even though it's less risk with a higher yield.
Would not suggest Put Write strategy (ZPH). Would prefer ZPAY for the US market. ZPH never owns the stocks whereas ZPAY wants to own the stock at better prices.