
TSE:TF
This summary was created by AI, based on 1 opinions in the last 12 months.
Timbercreek Financial (TF-T) is currently facing challenges as it has experienced a decline over the past five years. While the financial sector in Canada is predominantly led by banking institutions, there are still opportunities to invest in non-bank financials. Experts suggest that investors might expect a turnaround for Timbercreek in the future. However, caution is advised, especially for those who are not very familiar with the company. High dividends, particularly in the range of 9-10%, may indicate potential cuts to the dividend, as market sentiment often reflects concerns about sustainability. Therefore, potential investors may want to consider investing in more familiar financial services companies.
(A Top Pick Feb11/14. Down 1.52%.) You are just basically getting a 7% rate of return, but he’d like to see the NAV stabilize, which it kind of has. The biggest concern is that rates are so low and there is more competition in the space. It’s like they are on a treadmill. Once the mortgage gets paid down they have to go out and re-distribute the money. It is challenging, because they are always trying to get ahead of themselves. Cheap at these levels.
A mortgage lender. Restructured because they used to be a mortgage fund and they had to become a Corporation. They lend short-term, which banks don’t want to do. They get about an 8% yield and is trading at a discount to NAV. Even if interest rates rise, this is a perfect entity because it resets itself every year or two to higher funding rates. Lends to hospitals, apartment buildings, more stable entities. Yield of 8.72%.
Has underperformed and got hit by the interest-rate movement. Focuses on mortgage lending to multi-dwelling apartments or hospitals, short-term lending that banks don’t want to get into. Used to be a closed end mutual fund but is now a corporate entity so the trailer they had to pay to advisors has been eliminated. Trades at a big discount to its NAV which probably trails back up in 6-12 months.
This is a fund that is about to be turned into a corporate entity. He thinks they are the best in class to becoming experts. This is a more senior lending where you have a lot more loan-to-value protection. They lend on short-term lending agreements to hospitals or apartment buildings where there is less risk.
Generally does not own funds, but found he is not an expert nor has exposure in mortgage lending space. These guys have that expertise. Traded off because of interest sensitivity. They don’t just keep re-issuing their fund, but are buying it back. Less than 3% MER if not bought retail. They lend to hospitals or for short terms. 7% distribution.
(Top Pick Apr 25/12, Up 1.43% Total Return) It earns a 6% yield so you don’t get much price action out of it. It is secured mortgages that are well diversified. [Mr. Gardner said on the show that he thought distributions were on top of the return listed, but the BNN news letter lists this figure under total return.]
A pure yield vehicle. Throws off about 8.5% on his costs. Very akin to a mortgage REIT where you have to underwrite the portfolio every quarter, so it is a portfolio of loans. They do not own commercial real estate. Unless you got the time and the expertise to underwrite the loans, he would not recommend it.
A mortgage investment Corporation. Does not own real estate but owns a portfolio of loans that they generally originate and then recycle. This requires due diligence and you have to stay on top of it so he generally does not recommend it to retail investors. If you're happy with an 8% overall return, you can be a buyer.
(A Top Pick Feb 11/14. Down 7.12%.) This is a mortgage investment Corp. Has been hurt because they had prepayment issues last year. Has heard that insiders have been aggressive buyers of the stock. A good asset class to own. Yield of 9.33%.