The message, loud and clear, in recent weeks of earnings is the market is becoming more selective. Companies that delivered that earnings that would have been exceptional a year ago, are now facing pressure--strong earnings are no longer enough, but also need to justify high valuations, sustainable profitable, and a tangible return on AI. That enthusiasm about AI has shifted to seeing returns on investment and cash flows. This is healthy for the broader market, happening during surprising resilient economic growth. However, there's rising inflation above the US's 2% target. She's looking at companies' underlying cash flow and watching the bond market. Overall, the market looks constructive and you don't need to be defensive.
Based on polls, it looks like Trump will lose the House which will turn him into a lame duck president, then he will default to more executive orders. Meanwhile, central banks will keep raising interest rates. Yesterday, Google got hit, so the market is asking who will pay for AI. Overall, he's trimming and pull back, including Google after more than doubling, energy and precious metal.
For new money, telcos (as well as REITs and other sectors) have been hit as interest rates keep rising. The telcos, though, have aleady cut dividends, so they are relatively defensive. Getting more income into your portfolio now makes sense. So these sectors act like a bond proxy, which are buys.
The market expected today's Bank of Canada interest rate hike to 2.5%, given rising inflation fueled by rising energy prices from the U.S.-Iran war. It probably won't impact the TSX much because the index is heavily weighted in commodities and financials, which may actually benefit from higher rates. The hike follows the U.S. one. AI stocks are driving the market and there's a lack of market breadth. About half the S&P is tied to AI and data centres. But two-thirds of the S&P are trading below their 50-day moving average, mostly those not linked to AI, but that's where opportunities lie. He also likes energy.
The market is volatile. Everyday there is a sector or theme that works: one day AI works, the next AI isn't working, then it's energy or the hyperscalers, then not. We're all slaves to the algo trading and causes people to lose focus on long-term investing. He doesn't trade every two seconds; he focuses on the fundamentals, on quality businesses, over 3-5 years, companies that can grow EPS 10% annually and cash flow. He won't overpay for the enthusiasm for potential AI growth. He's attracted to niche US software and IT now, and the hyperscalers.
There's still room to run in global stocks in this rotation period, shifting away from U.S. tech, because investors are adding up the costs and returns in tech--and it isn't adding up. So, the shift has been to the opposite: energy, just energy thrived in the sluggish 70s. Washington: How lame duck is Trump? We'll likely see a Democrat Congress, though who knows what will happen to the Senate? Probably, we'll see gridlock, which markets like. Markets would be more bearish if things shifted entirely to the left, because of tax policy. Trump lowered corporate taxes, but there won't be tax changes for at least 6 months.
Anthropic IPO: Few surprises in today's prospectus and so far, so good. US Midterms: Historically, gridlock is good for stock markets, but what's different now is the colossal amount of US debt. Expect a shutdown in the first few months, but he hopes it won't be too disruptive. AI: Democratic states don't want new data centres in their backyard (NIMBY), which will force companies to adjust their building plans. This week, the Bank of Canada is expected to raise interest rate to keep pace with other central banks, given inflation. The world needs more housing supply and for wars to end.
Anthropic will IPO next month. Revenue growth per employee is far higher in the Mag 7 then the rest of the S&P 500, which has flatlined for the last 7 years. A chart of profit margins over that span is the same, with Mag 7 far outperforming the S&P 493. Anthropic touts AI is the most important tech to ever hit the planet given better productivity. Among the AI ETFs, AIQ is the passive way which outperforms when things are bad, but BAI outperforms when things are good. Both ETFs are the same now, and they both include SpaceX. Like SpaceX, he expects huge volatility from Anthropic, but buy the dips for a long-term hold.
It's a day-by-day thing: one day, tech rotates in, another day it rotates out. We haven't seen a full rotation though, because AI remains a dominant theme, but investors are asking when and what the returns will be, and when the capex spending will end. Who knows? Capex is massive, not since the railroads of the 1800s. He solds some Meta, Alphabet and Microsoft which he entered last spring. A lot of businesses are sitting on their hands, uncertain, like the car and steel sectors. We will feel this impact in the next few quarters.
Until very recently the market became very narrow, with only the largest of large-cap tech hanging in. As of this week, about 45% of companies in the S&P 500 are down more than 30%. With 60% down over 20%, 80% down over 10%.
The index has been looking pretty resilient, but there's a lot of weakness under the surface. Part of that has been from companies hurt by rising rates (defensive assets such as staples, utilities, etc). For companies that borrow fairly heavily, their borrowing costs have been going up.
In particular, the strength has been from companies generating lots of free cashflow and showing pretty steady dividend growth. Those have been his firm's focus.
Fearless Forecast for 2026
Forecasting is very hard, even for the smartest people out there. For example, a year ago we thought it could be a volatile year. And we were right on that, certainly in the first half of the year.
Last year, 24 strategists predicted that the S&P would be (on average) around 6500. And we're at 6900 right now. The bulls predicted ~7000. So the more optimistic views were closer to the actual market performance. As for earnings, the analysts were pretty much bang-on. They didn't, however, get the multiple right.
His next chart shows 4 ETFs. In the last week, Canada is the leader in the world (just surpassed the emerging markets). Then comes Europe, and then the US. The US market is actually the worst-performing, so he was wrong about that last year. Money is recognizing that there are challenges in the US and is moving to other places in the world.
Now let's look to the year ahead, and his chart computes numbers from 28 strategists. They see roughly 9% growth, and the S&P average price target is 7464 (Larry thinks it's doable, not sure about sustainable). The top 10 strategists (the bulls) are looking at 7700 to just a little over 8000. They all see really good earnings growth because of tax incentives, economic momentum, and midterm elections (where White House will push to keep markets and economy strong going into those). New leadership at the Fed will probably see a bit more easing.
Let's look at earnings and break it down by sector. The tech sector earned approximately $168 this year, but earnings for 2026 and 2027 are expected to grow 20-30+% annually. That one sector represents 35% of the market. If we start to see people worry about AI at some point in 2026, then analysts will have to change their outlook. But for now, we should continue to grind higher.
When you look at it from an individual stock perspective, and you consider what price targets the analysts are projecting and roll it up by market cap, you get 7938 (but that assumes every stock will be at its high, which won't happen). It does tell you, though, that there's a lot of enthusiasm for earnings growth going forward, and there's the economic backdrop to support it. That should continue for the first half of the year.
He's more concerned about the interest rate markets, with long end of the curve having trouble rallying. There's a tremendous amount of treasury supply. Market's getting very concerned about how we're going to fund all this. Thinks the yield curve will steepen, with short rates coming down a bit more.
They're pricing the next move by the BOC to be a rate hike, and he thinks that's insane. If the economy stays strong next year, and we get 2-3 rate cuts in the US but none in Canada, then all this pull-forward next year for capex spending could be a fiscal cliff coming in 2027 and beyond. It would be pretty bad for exuberantly priced markets. Eventually the long end of the curve responds to that, but not in 2026.
Now to gold and precious metals. People are worried about the world's fiscal challenges, and gold keeps going higher. Probably hit $5000 on gold before we correct. But when that liquidity bubble breaks, and we see $$ rushing into bonds, then money will come out of bitcoin, speculative assets, and gold too.