They haven't moved to the more sustainable model of an income trust in the energy sector. There has been a dramatic shift of payout ratios trending very strongly downwards.
They haven't moved to the more sustainable model of an income trust in the energy sector. There has been a dramatic shift of payout ratios trending very strongly downwards.
One of the original income trusts in Canada. In the last few years, it has not been doing as well, as some of its peer group. It still looks at itself is very much in the financial engineering mode where there has been a broad shift to growth through the drill bit. Had some stumbles.
One of the original income trusts in Canada. In the last few years, it has not been doing as well, as some of its peer group. It still looks at itself is very much in the financial engineering mode where there has been a broad shift to growth through the drill bit. Had some stumbles.
This one is a difficult situation for investors. A long term royalty trust, but hasn't kept up with its peers. A lttle bit late in moving to the newer model of holding back more of your cash and pay out less. Have had rising operating costs. Had some management changes. Better choices available.
This one is a difficult situation for investors. A long term royalty trust, but hasn't kept up with its peers. A lttle bit late in moving to the newer model of holding back more of your cash and pay out less. Have had rising operating costs. Had some management changes. Better choices available.
Royalty trusts have come down in valuation versus corporations, so they're looking somewhat better on a relative value. Tjis one is not a favourite. Has a higher payout ratio than a lot of the others so it has a somewhat higher cost base. Prefers trusts with a lower payout ratio so they can grow organically.
Royalty trusts have come down in valuation versus corporations, so they're looking somewhat better on a relative value. Tjis one is not a favourite. Has a higher payout ratio than a lot of the others so it has a somewhat higher cost base. Prefers trusts with a lower payout ratio so they can grow organically.
One of the traditional royalty trusts and management looks at it as primarily and engineering vehicle that will replace reserves through acquisitions. Feels that the newer model is moving away from that by having smaller payout ratios and grow more through drilling. Have lightened up on this trust significantly.
One of the traditional royalty trusts and management looks at it as primarily and engineering vehicle that will replace reserves through acquisitions. Feels that the newer model is moving away from that by having smaller payout ratios and grow more through drilling. Have lightened up on this trust significantly.
Not what he would refer to as a sustaining model. Take its cash flow, pay out distributions and figure out your money for capital expansion, it is paying out 120/130% of its cash flow.
Not what he would refer to as a sustaining model. Take its cash flow, pay out distributions and figure out your money for capital expansion, it is paying out 120/130% of its cash flow.
A $6/7 spread between the "A" shares and the "B" shares because of government ruling on US ownership. Management hasn't done a great job in running these trusts. If you buy, buy the "B" which is cheaper as they may discontinue the US one.
A $6/7 spread between the "A" shares and the "B" shares because of government ruling on US ownership. Management hasn't done a great job in running these trusts. If you buy, buy the "B" which is cheaper as they may discontinue the US one.